I read Lyric Alley some time ago and it obsessed me for weeks so much so , that I went looking for the picture of the uncle on the web….and then videos of the songs his poems had become….I was delighted to find them…. I have read other books by Leila and it is my feeling that it is not the writer’s style to write about raw politics …if more was mentioned about politics , it might have distracted from the people’s story which is what I found fascinating. Maybe there are other political writers who would be in a better position to make strong political statements….maybe we all have a diffrent story to tell…. Also I wonder …..It does say that the writer herself has Egyptian heritage in the family so maybe writing from that point of view would come naturally …saying so..I think the character of the first Sudanese wife was very well observed …I was quite convinced I had met her …quite beliveable I was struck by the fact that all the female characters seemed angry one way or another …but I think that the beauty of stories lies in the fact that they “explained” why people end up how they are ….and i think the book did that…in Leila’s usual gentle empathic style I loved it ….it affected me
Dear Farida, I am sure that your sentiments are genuine. What I love the most about Leila’s work is her diligent research. It came across clearly in the Translator and she did it again in Lyrics Alley. So, there are a lot of good things about the book that I did not get the chance to talk about because I was limited by the word count. My sister loves Leila’s books immensely and she thinks I get a little fascist about them. I think she is right. The simple truth is that each of us seeks different things in books as we do in life. For me, I have to agree with Sartre’s criteria for a work of art that makes “people ashamed of their existence”. But that’s just me. I think I was also intrigued and wanted to go check out the uncle and his songs. I was also impressed by how she painted the Sudanese wife and the honesty with which she did it as well. I don’t think the book needed to be about or around politics, but it would have given it the flavour of the place and time which, I think, was missing from it. It felt un-Sudanese if that makes any sense. It felt so to me anyway. By the way Nausea by Sartre (yes I am obsessed!) is not particularly political but very political at the very same time. Thanks for engaging and your opinion.